Working for International Dialogue and Peace

US has violated Article 1 of the NPT

by Grant Smith (source: Antiwar.com) May 19, 2012

Newly declassified FBI files are shining an inconvenient light on Israel’s nuclear weaponization research program and how it has been secretly funded from the United States. Iranian negotiations with the UN Security Council resume on May 23 in Baghdad following initial sessions in Istanbul. The core issue is whether Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) signatory Iran will agree to abandon uranium enrichment and open its hardened facilities to more intrusive international inspections. Israel and its western lobbying organizations have long insisted — with little concrete proof — that Iran has a clandestine weaponization program. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is diligently setting out legislative tripwires for mandatory US military attacks if Iran fails to abandon its program. Yet the brazen activities of the Weizmann Institute of Science now publicly documented by the FBI reveal violations of the core principle of the NPT. ››read more


That Was Now, This is Then

by Nima Shirazi (source: Wide Sleep in America) May 18, 2012

On Tuesday afternoon, the U.S. House of Representatives debated H.Res. 568, an AIPAC-sponsored bill designed to outlaw diplomacy with Iran and take the United States Congress one step closer to authorizing an illegal, unprovoked and premeditated military attack on Iran. ››read more


Western diplomats are still getting it wrong on Iran

by Peter Jenkins (source: Guardian) May 17, 2012

If the west wants a negotiated agreement over Iran's nuclear activities, it must play straight and offer real reciprocity ››read more


US Envoy: Talks Don’t Mean US Won’t Attack Iran

by Jason Ditz (source: antiwar.com) May 17, 2012

Days Ahead of Baghdad Summit, Threats Return ››read more


Hawks seek to sabotage Iran negotiations

(source: CASMII) May 14, 2012

Now, more than ever, public pressure must be brought to bear against the crippling sanctions and relentless military threats against Iran. It is only greater public awareness that can prevent the senseless drive towards war. In particular we call for greatest mobilization in the rallies in the US and UK on May 19th and 20th against the NATO Summit in Chicago. ››read more


MAKE YOUR MP WORK TO STOP IRAN WAR

(source: Stop the War Coalition) April 14, 2012

We are asking you to take this chance to lobby your MP to back an early day motion in Parliament against military attack on Iran. We have a highly effective online lobbying system that allows you to email your MP at the click of a mouse. Please put the pressure on now by going to: http://bit.ly/HCX59F ››read more


Spinning Up For Baghdad

by PAUL PILLAR (source: The National Interest) May 17, 2012

In the case of the Iranian nuclear program, one form of inflated expectations involves the prospective terms of an agreement, such as calling for an end to all uranium enrichment by Iran, even though that would be a deal killer from Iran's perspective. Another form concerns timing, such as an insistence that a specific agreement emerge from the meeting this month in Baghdad, even though a full, workable agreement requires a careful negotiation process that has barely just begun.
››read more


Hands off Syria and Iran: Russia

by JOHN LYONS (source: The Australian) May 18, 2012

RUSSIA has made clear it will not support any Western military intervention in Syria or Iran, warning that such a course could lead to nuclear war. ››read more


House Bill Shifting Red Line for War on Iran Passes Overwhelmingly

by John Glaser (source: anti war) May 17, 2012

The vote, passed 401-11, effectively calls for a military attack on Iran when it obtains a “nuclear weapons capability” – an undefined term that, by some interpretations, could already apply to Iran, not to mention Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, and any other country with a civilian nuclear program.
››read more


Iran vows never to renounce nuclear ‘rights’

(source: DAWN) May 17, 2012

Jalili and AshtonJalili and AshtonJalili: “To those who say that time is running out for dialogue, I reply: What is running out is the policy of pressuring Iran, because this strategy has not yielded the results” expected by world powers. ››read more


To Talk Or Not To Talk

by Peter Jenkins (source: Lobelog) May 17, 2012

Since late January, when the White House decided there would be advantage in reverting to a policy of engagement after having acquired political cover in the form of additional sanctions, the possibility of direct talks between the United States and Iran has been in the air. ››read more


        Editor's note: Peter Jenkins was the UK’s Permanent Representative to the IAEA for 2001-06 and is now a partner in ADRg Ambassadors.

Hopes grow of a confidence-building deal on Iranian nuclear programme

by Julian Borger (source: The Guardian) May 16, 2012

Positive signs ahead of Baghdad talks suggest that concessions on both sides could lead to a permanent dialogue ››read more


Iran, IAEA Extend Nuclear Talks as Both Sides Laud Tone

by Jonathan Tirone (source: Bloomberg ) May 16, 2012

Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors extended a round of negotiations over the Persian Gulf nation’s suspected nuclear-weapon work after both sides said progress had been made. ››read more


Urgent: Congress voting on pro-war Iran resolution today

(source: NIAC) May 15, 2012

Congress is planning to vote today to make war with Iran more likely.

This afternoon, the House of Representatives is going to consider H.Res.568 – a resolution that significantly lowers the threshold for war with Iran.

It is no coincidence that this vote is taking place just a week before the U.S. and Iran resume negotiations that many in the pro-war camp want to sabotage.

We need your help today to stop this push for war.
››read more


State Dept. Poised to Remove Iranian Terror Group From Terror List

by Jason Ditz (source: Anti war) May 14, 2012

A number of politicians have been openly endorsing the organization, arguing that formal US backing for the organization would be a key step toward regime change in Iran. The MeK has been paying off top officials for years to endorse their removal from the terror list, offering $20,000 for a 20 minute speech of support. ››read more


Israel Fears P5+1, Iran Could Reach Deal Next Week

by Jason Ditz (source: Antiwar.com) May 15, 2012

Next week, the members of the P5+1 nations will gather in Baghdad for a second round of high profile meetings with Iran. After last month’s meeting in Istanbul was termed “productive,” there is considerable hope that a deal is possible. ››read more


IAEA Parchin Demand Puts Iran Cooperation Pact at Risk

by Gareth Porter (source: Antiwar.com) May 15, 2012

In meetings with Iranian officials in Vienna this week, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) apparently intends to hold up agreement on a plan for Iran’s full cooperation in clarifying allegations of covert nuclear weapons work by insisting that it must first let the nuclear agency visit Parchin military base. ››read more


House Votes This Week to Tie Obama's Hands on Iran

by MJ Rosenberg (source: Huffington Post ) May 14, 2012

On Tuesday, the House of Representatives is slated to vote on a resolution designed to tie the president's hands on Iran policy. The resolution, which is coming up under an expedited House procedure, was the centerpiece of AIPAC's recent conference. ››read more


IAEA refuses Iran cooperation pact

by Gareth Porter (source: Asia Times) May 14, 2012

WASHINGTON - Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Yukiya Amano has signaled that there will be no agreement with Iran in meetings in Vienna on Monday and Tuesday on the terms for Iranian cooperation in clarifying the issue of alleged nuclear weapons work. ››read more


Patrick Cockburn: Netanyahu's threats to bomb Iran have served Israel – and the US – very well

by Patrick Cockburn (source: Independent) May 12, 2012

How far is Washington complicit in Mr Netayahu's strategy of issuing horrendous threats, and how far does it believe them? ››read more